Major Supreme Court Rulings Offer A Mixed Bag For Common-Sense Conservatives
You could say that the Supreme Court giveth and the Supreme Court taketh away. Some major rulings this week from the highest court in the land were a mixed bag for anyone who is a common-sense “God and country” conservative.
First, the good news. On Tuesday, the court struck a major blow against transgender madness when it upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that banned biological males from participating in girls’ sports at public schools.
That is great news, but the fact that we reached the point in our country that this even needed to be brought before the Supreme Court in the first place tells you how much we have lost our way when it comes to moral clarity and the biblical mandate to protect children.
This reality was further demonstrated at a Seattle Pride Parade over the weekend, where grown men marched naked as little kids looked on. The disturbing sight raises a number of questions. What kind of parent in their right mind would take their kids to this gathering of sexual degeneracy? Where are the police? Are there no indecent exposure laws in Seattle? Are you allowed to just walk around buck naked downtown in full view of children? Apparently so.
This is why polls show that the American people are turning sharply against the LGBTQ agenda.
At the very least, the Supreme Court got the in girls’ sports ruling right. Unfortunately, I believe the court went against the will of a majority of the American people in two other cases.
On Monday, the court ruled that mail-in ballots can be counted after election day—so, get ready for more fraud and shenanigans from the left at election time and several weeks of counting ballots!
Chief Justice John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, who were both appointed by Republican presidents, sided with their liberal colleagues on this case. It isn’t the first time this duo has disappointed conservatives. In fact, they did it again one day later.
On Tuesday, SCOTUS voted 6-3 to shoot down President Trump’s executive order outlawing birthright citizenship. The president’s order declared that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily cannot automatically become U.S. citizens. Seems like common sense and sound national security policy, but the Supreme Court disagreed.
Consider this observation from journalist Megan Basham about a Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate: “Francesca Hong was born to non-citizen immigrants. In other words, she has citizenship in the U.S. because she was born here when her parents were on student visas. And now she is running as a socialist in order to dismantle the American way of life. Tell me more about how this isn’t a problem.”
Amen. The Supreme Court just made a very big mistake.
